UPDATE: Kirsty Gallacher, the well-known TV presenter, faces public scrutiny after her claims regarding public transport accessibility were challenged. Reports reveal that her luxurious £1.5 million home is just a 15-minute walk from a bus stop, contradicting her assertion in court that she lives far from “reliable” public transport.
Gallacher appeared in High Wycombe magistrates’ court on November 14, 2025, seeking to overturn a six-month driving ban for speeding. She claimed she could not afford taxis and depended on driving to care for her two sons and attend medical appointments related to her benign brain tumour. Despite earning £150,000 annually and having £80,000 in savings, she argued that public transport was insufficient for her needs.
However, investigative findings from the Daily Mail reveal that her home is only a mile away from a bus stop, which connects to train stations in Bracknell and Maidenhead, both offering direct services to London. The bus ride takes roughly 20 minutes, and trains from Maidenhead reach Paddington in as little as 17 minutes for just £16.40.
In a tearful appeal, Gallacher described herself as “broken,” expressing frustration that the judge showed no empathy during the sentencing. District Judge Arvind Sharma dismissed her plea, emphasizing that transportation alternatives were adequate, despite her claiming that the ban would significantly impact her family.
Gallacher was caught speeding at 35mph in a 30mph zone on April 1, 2025. With nine points on her license from prior offenses, she was subject to an automatic ban under the “totting up” procedure. The court imposed a £1,044 fine as part of her sentencing.
The former Sky Sports News presenter has previously faced legal issues, including a two-year driving ban in 2017 for drink-driving. As a single mother of two, she highlighted her struggles with mental health and the challenges of managing her household amid health complications.
Gallacher’s plea to maintain her driving privileges is not just about convenience; it encompasses her ability to support her family and manage her health issues. Following her recent attack in London, where she was assaulted on the street, she expressed heightened vulnerability and anxiety about her safety.
As the story develops, many are questioning the consistency of Gallacher’s claims against the backdrop of her financial standing and the realities of public transport access in her area. This incident raises broader discussions about the accountability of public figures and the complexities of their personal challenges.
Next steps: Gallacher’s legal team is expected to appeal the court’s decision. Meanwhile, her supporters are rallying around her, emphasizing the need for empathy and understanding for those facing personal and health challenges.
Stay tuned for more updates on this evolving situation.
