In a controversial move, Nigel Farage, the Member of Parliament for Clacton-on-Sea, opted to forgo his attendance at the Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on January 6, 2026, to appear on a new radio show, PMQs Unpacked, on Times Radio. This decision has sparked significant criticism from members of the public who believe it reflects a lack of commitment to his constituents and parliamentary duties.
Farage, who has been known for his unconventional approach to politics, has a history of low attendance at parliamentary sessions, including PMQs. He has served as MP for Clacton-on-Sea since winning the seat in 2014 after several unsuccessful attempts. Critics have pointed out that despite being elected to represent his constituency, he has yet to hold any in-person surgeries for his constituents.
A recent tweet from Rob B, a Clacton resident, humorously highlighted this absence: “If any Clacton constituents would like a chat – I’ll be about 2000 miles over there.” This comment underscores the growing frustration among constituents regarding Farage’s commitment to his role as an MP.
With one of the poorest attendance records in the House of Commons, Farage’s decision to prioritize a media appearance over parliamentary responsibilities has drawn ire. Many believe that his focus on lucrative media opportunities detracts from his obligations to his constituents.
Public reaction on social media has been swift and vociferous. One user remarked, “This is utterly ludicrous. Farage is paid — by us — to attend Parliament. Now the Times are paying him to stay away.” Others echoed similar sentiments, questioning his work ethic and commitment to serving the people of Clacton-on-Sea.
One comment pointedly noted, “Nigel Farage. Man who moans that PMQs is rigged, but hardly ever turns up to see rigged PMQs, will now hold his alternative PMQs.” Such remarks emphasize the perception that Farage is more interested in self-promotion than in fulfilling his duties as an elected official.
As far as public expectations are concerned, many believe that MPs should prioritize their roles in Parliament above media engagements. Criticism has mounted over Farage’s choice to host an alternative version of PMQs while being compensated for his role as an MP.
Responses to his decision reflect a broader frustration with politicians who seem to prioritize personal branding over public service. One Twitter user sarcastically commented, “The beauty of this is that I get paid to spout whatever nonsense I like on this show, while I’m already being paid to be at the real PMQs, even though I can’t be bothered to turn up.”
This incident also raises questions about accountability in public office. Farage’s critics argue that if he cannot fulfil the responsibilities of his position, he should reconsider his role in Parliament. The discontent surrounding his absence at PMQs illustrates a growing demand for MPs to remain accountable to their constituents.
In light of the backlash, it remains to be seen how Farage will respond to the criticism and whether this will impact his future engagements in Parliament or the media. As public scrutiny continues, the question of how elected officials balance their duties with personal ambitions will remain at the forefront of political discourse in the UK.
