Stockbridge is considering a proposal to modify a special permit from 2014 concerning the historic Elm Court Estate, a site known for its significant architectural and historical value. On December 4, 2023, the Stockbridge Select Board reviewed an application from a development team led by Linda Law and Dr. Richard Peiser, who purchased the property in December 2022 under the name Vanderbilt Berkshires Estate LLC (VBE).
Elm Court, an 1886 Gilded Age mansion located at 310 Old Stockbridge Road, is recognized as the largest shingle-style residence in the United States. It was originally commissioned by Emily Thorn Vanderbilt and William Douglas Sloane. The estate’s 55,000-square-foot manor house served as a venue for discussions that contributed to the end of World War I and the establishment of the League of Nations. Despite its rich history, the property has faced challenges, with three previous attempts to restore and develop it failing after abandonment.
The proposed amendment seeks to create a wellness resort, restaurant, spa, and freestanding single-family homes under a condominium structure. The developers aim to minimize the ecological impact by establishing 218 parking spaces across six areas and incorporating public walking trails and restored landscape features. Notably, the plan allocates 35 acres, or 40 percent of the 89-acre site, for conservation and recreation, while aiming to develop 25 acres, or 28 percent, of the property.
The development plans fall under the town’s Cottage Era Estates bylaw, which facilitates the preservation of historic grounds through financially viable investments. Jonathan Silverstein, the attorney representing the developers, emphasized that modifying the existing permit is beneficial as it streamlines the approval process while maintaining the essence of the initial project.
Comparatively, the amended proposal reduces the number of guest rooms from 112 in the original permit to 74, while introducing 38 resort residences that were not part of the 2014 approval. Both versions of the project include a 60-seat restaurant and a spa ranging from 15,000 to 16,000 square feet.
Traffic impacts were also discussed during the meeting. Ken Cramm, a traffic engineer, reported that the recent traffic study indicated a slight increase in vehicle trips during weekday morning peak hours. However, the report also noted a decrease in trips during weekday afternoons and Saturday peak periods, attributed to the reduced number of hotel rooms.
The proposed amendment is projected to enhance Stockbridge’s economy, potentially contributing between $2.6 million and $3.7 million to the town’s tax base, creating 85 to 105 new jobs, and generating an annual uptick of $2.2 million to $2.3 million in local spending. Additionally, VBE plans to contribute $1.7 million to the local affordable housing trust.
The proposal is scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Board on December 16, 2023, at 18:30, following a previously canceled meeting due to weather conditions. Kate Fletcher, the Planning Board Chair, indicated that her group would offer recommendations to the Select Board after the upcoming session.
Community responses to the proposal have been mixed. Former Select Board member Patrick White highlighted the need for financial growth in Stockbridge, particularly with significant projects like a new high school and a joint fire and emergency medical services program with West Stockbridge on the horizon.
In contrast, some residents expressed concerns over the proposed modifications. Mary Berle, a lifelong resident of Stockbridge, argued that the changes represent a fundamentally different land use than originally permitted, warranting a new application process. She cautioned that the project could compromise the landscape’s beauty, urging developers to adhere to standard protocols.
The ongoing discussion surrounding the Elm Court project reflects broader community concerns about development and its impact on local history and resources. The Select Board’s hearing will continue on January 22, 2024, at 18:30, as stakeholders await further evaluation of the proposed modifications.
