Lesbian Action Group Appeals Ruling to Exclude Trans Women

URGENT UPDATE: The Lesbian Action Group (LAG) is making headlines as they challenge a recent ruling from the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) that denied their request to exclude trans women from their events. This appeal comes amid rising tensions surrounding gender identity and anti-discrimination laws in Victoria, Australia.

The LAG, a gender-critical lesbian group based in Victoria, argues they have the legal right to create spaces exclusively for “lesbians born female” to foster community and opportunities. Their appeal, initiated against a 2023 ruling by the AHRC, seeks a five-year exemption under the 2010 Equal Opportunity Act, which permits temporary exclusions if they promote equal opportunity.

In their original request, the LAG highlighted that allowing trans women into lesbian spaces could dilute their community by attracting biological males. LAG spokesperson Nicole Mowbray stated, “Young and emerging lesbians cannot find their people because we’ve been underground in order to keep [biological] males out of our dating pool and our events.”

The AHRC’s decision faced swift backlash from other lesbian organizations. Dykes on Bikes condemned their stance, labeling it as “dangerous transphobic rhetoric and hate.” They warned that such exclusions would harm and divide the community when unity is needed most.

Now, as the LAG escalates their fight to the Federal Court, co-counsel Megan Blake argues that the commission’s ruling fails to recognize the right of lesbians to exclude heterosexual and homosexual men, claiming that trans women should be treated similarly to biological men. “Lesbians are united by one or more common features … mainly biology,” Dr. Blake stated in a recent interview.

Conversely, the counsel for the commission, Celia Winnett, emphasized that the legislation aims to protect all individuals equally. “There’s an objective of eliminating discrimination on the basis of gender identity just as much as there is an objective of eliminating sex discrimination,” Winnett explained.

While LAG faces significant opposition, they maintain that their goal is not to promote hate. Mowbray claims, “We fully support trans people living their best lives and creating their own spaces and having their own events. There’s plenty of trans-only events and that’s fine. We would just like to be afforded the same right.”

As the case develops, observers are keen to see how the Federal Court will interpret the balance between gender identity rights and the rights of women to create exclusive spaces. This urgent legal battle continues to spark debate across Australia and beyond, highlighting the complexities of gender, identity, and community.

Stay tuned for updates as this story unfolds. The implications of this ruling could have lasting effects on anti-discrimination laws and the LGBTQ+ community’s dynamics in Australia.